Online disinformation fueled UK riots but regulators can't take action

Online disinformation fueled UK riots but regulators can’t take action


Riot police officers push back anti-migration protesters outside on Aug. 4, 2024 in Rotherham, U.K.

Christopher Furlong | Getty Images

LONDON — Ofcom, the U.K.’s media regulator, was chosen last year by the government as the regulator in charge of policing harmful and illegal content on the internet under strict new online safety regulations.

But even as online disinformation related to stabbings in the U.K. has led to real-world violence, Ofcom, Britain’s online safety regulator finds itself unable to take effective enforcement actions.

Last week, a 17-year-old knifeman attacked several children attending a Taylor Swift-themed dance class in the English town of Southport in Merseyside.

Three girls were killed in the attack. Police subsequently identified the suspect as Axel Rudakubana.

Shortly after the attack, social media users were quick to falsely identify the perpetrator as an asylum seeker who arrived in the U.K. by boat in 2023.

On X, posts sharing the fake name of the perpetrator were actively shared and were viewed by millions.

That in turn helped spark far-right, anti-immigration protests, which have since descended into violence, with shops and mosques being attacked and bricks and petrol bombs being hurled.

Why can’t Ofcom take action?

But Ofcom, the regulator tasked with taking action over failings to tackle misinformation and other harmful material online, is unable at this stage to take effective actions on the tech giants allowing harmful posts inciting the ongoing riots because not all the powers from the act have come into force.

New duties on social media platforms under the Online Safety Act requiring firms to actively identify, mitigate and manage the risks of harm from illegal and harmful content on their platforms have not yet taken effect.

Once the rules fully take effect, Ofcom would have the power to levy fines of as much as 10% of companies’ global annual revenues for breaches, or even jail time for individual senior managers in cases where repeat breaches occur.

But until that happens, the watchdog is unable to penalize firms for online safety breaches.

Under the Online Safety Act, the sending of false information intended to cause non-trivial harm is considered a punishable criminal offense. That would likely include misinformation aiming to incite violence.

How has Ofcom responded?

This will be the most pro-business Treasury Britain has ever seen: UK Finance Minister Rachel Reeves



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *